top of page
  • Writer's picturePaul Grisanti

One last Taxation Seminar and a Possible Problem on the Radar

I just had the good fortune to attend a Taxation Seminar hosted by Registered Advisor Jason Lowther of Western International Securities. The Main Speaker was Bill Exeter of Exeter 1031 Exchange Services.

It turns out that Google is not correct when they say that insurance proceeds are not taxable. This may be true when talking about contents coverage or alternative living expense, but the IRS does believe that any portion of your settlement that reimburses you for what would have been a long-term capital gain is taxable if it is not reinvested in rebuilding the damaged property. That is why the 1033 Involuntary Conversion rules were created.

A 1033 exchange is more liberal in many ways. It allows you to reinvest in a new Principal Residence within 2, or 4, years depending on who you talk to. The new residence must be of equal or greater value, but there is no requirement that the previous ratio of debt to equity must be maintained.

Mr. Exeter and Mr. Lowther also discussed several other strategies for financial survival from a disaster. The options are many and depend upon your individual situation. Please discuss the above information and any other options that you are considering with your CPA and/or Tax Attorney.

I have concluded that the 1033 option is wonderful for those who wanted to move anyway due to different housing needs as they have aged in place.

For most families, rebuilding your previous sq. Ft. plus 10% as allowed by the City and County is the preferable option due to the accelerated permit processing that should put a permit in your hand within approx. 6 months from the first application. Get started on your application now! If you should change your mind, the work and reports you generated towards the goal of rebuilding will make your lot more valuable.

Bad News

The City Council at their meeting of February 25th, 2019 had a discussion of Neighborhood Character and Coastal Development Permits, (Item #5A on the Agenda if you would like to review the Video on the City’s website). As a result of the discussion and vote, an Ordinance is being drafted reducing the upper limit for the largest home that could be built in Malibu from 11,000 Sq. ft. to 8,500 sq. ft. Smaller properties would also see their upper limits reduced and the new size curve will be generated. At Rick Mullen’s urging they decided to further reduce everyone’s buildout to 75% of the already reduced new curve, or 110% of the average size of other homes within 500 feet, whichever is greater.

Mayor Pro Tem Karen Farrer was the only Council Person to not vote in favor of this abomination.

If this new ordinance is approved by the Planning Commission and then the City Council, it is difficult to imagine any permit that will not require an expensive and unpleasant ordeal pitting as you are forced to defend your remodel or rebuild in front of the always obnoxious Planning Commission. The possible reduction in buildout size will reduce the value of your Fire rebuild lot if your buyer wants to build something larger than the +10 % the Current ordinance entitles you to. Stay tuned.

0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Paul Grisanti 4 City Council to make a better Malibu

Traffic and Parking Malibu has gotten a reputation as a place where our visitors can get away with anything. We need more law enforcement. We’re already spending about $9,000,000 on the Sheriffs ann

Power outage sparks Woolsey memories

On Sunday August 2nd, I got up at 5:45 AM and crept into the bathroom to get ready for my day. I flipped the light switch and nothing happened. Immediately my mind switched into Woolsey mode. Why i

Traffic hell on PCH as COVID-19 moderating

On Sunday the 26th, I was reminded why I try not to leave the neighborhood after noon on a summer weekend. I accepted three appointments between 1:00 and 3:30 and ventured forth into Malibu’s version


Kommentarsfunktionen har stängts av.
bottom of page